kaffe-1.0.b1 probs on Linux
ben at algroup.co.uk
Wed Jul 15 09:01:01 PDT 1998
Godmar Back wrote:
> > You may still include classes.zip *after* Klasses.jar, if you still
> > wish to run `javac', for example, but this is illegal, because
> > classes.zip is not GPL'ed, and you can't link GPL'ed and non-GPL'ed
> > code together.
> I think it's only illegal if you plan on distributing it. Running
> it should be fine.
> Also, it's not just javac: Kaffe still doesn't have a javap, serialver,
> rmic, and rmiregistry.
classes.zip is not "linked" to any GPLed code in this case, IMO. It
seems to me that if this were true, it would be a breach of GPL to run,
for example, Apache on Linux. And since several Linux vendors bundle it,
I find that a little hard to believe.
OTOH, Kaffe should have a Berkeley licence, then we wouldn't even have
to debate the question.
Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org/
and Technical Director|Email: ben at algroup.co.uk |
A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL author http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache/
WE'RE RECRUITING! http://www.aldigital.co.uk/recruit/
More information about the kaffe