maybe... (was Re: Bug un tableswitch)

[Maxim Kizub]

Godmar Back wrote:
> 
> Maxim, Edouard,
> 
> > >
> > > May be we sould use an unsigned compare function ?
> >
> > Maybe, it's better to have
> 
> Maybe what we're looking for here is a patch and a testcase?
> 

I did mean to test low/high values before substruction.
Shure it's not a patch, because:

> >
> > Also, I did asked, but nobody answered me -
> > what are start/end_sub_block() makroses?
> > what are slot_alloctmp() and slot_freetmp()?
> > Why, aftre slot_freetmp() kaffe still stores
> > my tmp value in stack?
> > Also, I can't understand rules of using
> > labels in kaffe codegenerator...
> >
> > The code I've wrote for new bytecodes works
> > somehow, but _I_do_not_understand_what_I_do_!!!
> >
> 
> Maybe nobody knows or has the time to explain it?

Because of this.