BUG (small) in java.util.Vector

Archie Cobbs archie at whistle.com
Fri Jan 14 16:46:27 PST 2000

jan grant writes:
> Since this class now implements java.util.List, it's worth pointing out
> that
> java.util.Vector doesn't supply an implementation for add (although it
> has the
> functionally identical addElement)

It's implemented in the superclass, AbstractList. Is there a functional
reason we should override it (versus just to do the same as JDK does)?

> It's a trivial fix; what's the state-of-play regarding the 1.2-ness of
> Kaffe's classes?

We try to be 1.2 compliant.. it's mostly true but not completely true.


Archie Cobbs   *   Whistle Communications, Inc.  *   http://www.whistle.com

More information about the kaffe mailing list