[kaffe] DocBook and Maven proposal
robilad at kaffe.org
Sun Nov 30 23:34:02 PST 2003
Michael Franz wrote:
> Now that I am fooling around with doxygen, I found
> that it can actually provide some documentation
> without the special tags. It is actually a good
> starting point for understanding the API with Kaffe.
> Once the tags are added, the documentation will make
> it easier to understand what different methods do.
> It also understands the JavaDoc tags, so, do we use
> the C tags or stick with the JavaDoc tags?
I'd say use the javadoc tags. I guess the only relevant tag is @param
anyway ;) I've seen that one was used by Helmer to add some comments to
the core VM.
More information about the kaffe