[Kaffe] new stack trace patch.

[Godmar Back]

> 
> Well, if it makes all exceptions slower then I would rather just see the
> printStackTrace() print the constructors too. I do not think this feature
> is worth slowing down exception throwing or catching in the case where
> a stack trace is never printed.
> 

Agreed.  I reversed the patch, especially given that JDK with jit does
the same.

I think it's safe to say code that parses stacktrace will have to be
VM-specific.

About Alex's problem: another possibility to access thread-local
storage without adding locals would be to use java.lang.ThreadLocal.
That's a bit expensive, but it's for debugging only anyway.

	- Godmar