Introduction, new maintainer for kaffe
jim at kaffe.org
Wed Mar 13 07:27:51 PST 2002
Thanks for offer.
I'll try to make it as easy as possible to contribute to the project.
I'm still in the middle of moving stuff to the new server. I got the CVS
archives yesterday (thanks Ean), so I hope to set up the CVS today. I need
to redo the webpages soon too.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fernando Branquinho" <branqs at ig.com.br>
To: <kaffe at rufus.w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: Introduction, new maintainer for kaffe
I'm a novice in Java environment, but i'm very interested in contribute with
this project. I worked to many years with "C" language in the industrial
software area, and i know enough about design patterns, mainly because today
i'm a university professor in Software Engineering. I would like to know, if
you think my colaboration may be interesting.
I thank you very much, and congratulations about your new respossability.
Fernando Branquinho (Brazil) www.geocities.com/branqs
De: Jim Pick <jim at kaffe.org>
Para: kaffe at rufus.w3.org <kaffe at rufus.w3.org>
Cc: kaffe-announce at rufus.w3.org <kaffe-announce at rufus.w3.org>
Data: Terça-feira, 12 de Março de 2002 20:16
Assunto: Introduction, new maintainer for kaffe
>I'd like to introduce myself. My name is Jim Pick.
>I have volunteered to take over the reigns of the kaffe project from
>it's original author, Tim Wilkinson.
>I've been following Kaffe's progress since about the time I first got
>involved in free software (around 1996). In the past, I've been an
>active Debian maintainer, and I also ran LinuxHQ.com, KernelNotes.org,
>and Kernel.org for a while, amongst other things.
>I know Tim quite well, as I moved to Berkeley, California (from
>Canada) to work with him and Peter Mehlitz at Transvirtual about two
>years ago. Tim is currently involved in the process of starting a new
>company, having left Transvirtual at the end of November last year. I
>still work at Transvirtual though, and I'm still good friends with Tim
>(we usually meet for coffee in the mornings). It was during one of
>those morning coffees that I asked Tim what was happening with
>Kaffe.org, and whether or not he was planning to do any more work on
>As I suspected, he stated that he really doesn't have time to do
>anymore work on it (especially since he no longer works at
>Transvirtual). He stated that he'd be happy if I took it over. I
>also checked with the new CEO of Transvirtual, Chris Herron, and Peter
>Mehlitz, if it was OK with them if I did some work to try to get the
>Kaffe.org project moving again, and they thought it was a good idea
>and were very supportive.
>I've announced my intentions to the core team, and they all seemed OK
>with the idea -- I asked if anybody else wanted the job, but there
>were no takers. So I guess I've got the go ahead to do this. :-)
>I've also taken over development of Transvirtual's internal,
>proprietary version of Kaffe (now called KaffePro), so I'm in the
>situation where I can spend a lot of time thinking about JVM
>Anyways, here's what I'm planning to do:
>1) Setup a new machine and website for kaffe.org, so everything can be
> centralized on one site.
> Transvirtual has donated a machine and rackspace for it, and I've
> already set it up. I've already moved the DNS and the ftp site
> onto it. The current website is looking pretty old and
> out-of-date, so I'm going to replace it with something simpler.
> I'm hoping I can get the CVS archive from Ean Schuessler at
> Brainfood so I can set it up on the new machine. Also, down the
> road, it would be nice to migrate the mailing list to the new
> machine so Daniel Veillard doesn't have to maintain it.
> I thought about using SourceForge, but I decided against it.
>2) Make a new release as soon as possible.
> Version 1.0.6 came out in July, 2000, and there hasn't been a
> release since (although there has been CVS activity). I'd like to
> do a minimal amount of testing, and see if we can get it out,
> perhaps as early as next week.
>3) Clarify the relationship between Transvirtual and Kaffe.org.
> As a long-time kaffe-watcher, I would like to see Kaffe.org be a
> very open project, which incorporates code from, and interoperates
> with all the other free virtual machine projects out there. I
> definitely see Kaffe.org as being an independent project that isn't
> controlled by Transvirtual.
> Transvirtual is willing to donate time and code to the project to
> make it successful. On the other hand, it would be best if
> everybody was comfortable with the fact that my employer is
> actively developing a proprietary version of kaffe, called
> KaffePro, which is designed to address the needs of the commercial
> market for clean room Java virtual machine implementations.
> As a commercial software company built on developing Intellectual
> Property, Transvirtual needs to be selective about what it does
> and does not contribute to the project. You can expect that
> Transvirtual won't hold back bug fixes from the free version, and
> will not prevent others from contributing to the project.
> Transvirtual, as a company, was founded with Kaffe as it's primary
> product, so you can expect to see Transvirtual continue to use,
> maintain and protect the Kaffe trademark for it's own purposes.
> It is important to Transvirtual that Kaffe.org is successful, but
> also that it is clear to the public that Kaffe.org's JVM
> implementation is separate from Transvirtual's KaffePro product,
> even though they share a common heritage.
> (whew, glad that's over, I'm afraid I was starting to sound like a
>4) Start active development on a new major release of kaffe.
> I've got a lot of ideas for what should be done with it. But I'll
> discuss those separately because I'd like to see some contributions
> and some debate. :-)
>Anyways, this email has been long enough. I'm looking forward to
>working on kaffe and Kaffe.org - it should be fun!
> - Jim
>p.s. If you're reading this, and you're going to JavaOne this year in
> San Francisco, let's get together for beers. :-)
More information about the kaffe