[kaffe] Re: moving config/superh to config/sh

[Dalibor Topic]

Kiyo Inaba wrote:
> Sorry, I miss this mail.
> 
> 
>>I'd like to rename the config/superh directory to config/sh to go with
>>the usuall gnu toolchain names for superh processors (sh*).
> 
> 
> Yeah, everytime I think we have to change it to be compatible with
> gnu toolchain. I am not sure why Transvirtual's guy use this name
> but in long run, 'sh' should be better.
> 
> (My personal preference is superh rather than sh because the name
> 'sh' is too short and in some sence easy to mislead, but this is
> the name selected by gnu and much better to obey their idea...)

I agree on the superh name being better, but alas, the GNU guys picked 
sh, it makes maintenance easier to go with that name. In accordance with 
that, I've finished the move over to sh. I hope that everything works 
ok, my cross-compiles for sh3 and sh4 passed.

cheers,
dalibor topic