Locked in the clean-room
azcb0 at juno.uts.amdahl.com
Mon Apr 14 02:39:18 PDT 1997
> > Does anyone have any legal advice or experience of operating and
> > developing software in a clean-room? I ask because there have been a
> > number of instances lately where people want to donate code to Kaffe
> > but they have already signed the Sun source license, usually for JDK 1.0.2
> > though not for JDK 1.1.
> You may want to look at the lawsuit AT&T/Berkeley a couple of years ago.
> CSRG has always had the Unix source code available, but they did continously
> rewrite parts of the unix kernel and made the code available for everyone.
> AT&T (their lawyers anyway :-) said that because CSRG had the AT&T sources
> available, the Berkeley code was based on AT&T sources.
> AT&T lost in court. Here are at least an american example of this.
> The lawsuit was much more complicated than this, but the big
> point is the same.
Like Ragge says, it's more complicated than this, but the conclusion
given above is wrong. AT&T didn't lose in court, they settled the case
outside of court, so it's still a grey area - especially given the fact
that BSDi and the *BSD groups agreed to re-write 8 critical files as
part of the settlement reached.
In general, I (personally) would be very wary of including code by
someone tainted by the 1.0.2 JDK. And I write as someone tainted by the
More information about the kaffe