large Class.forName() patch

Jason Baker jbaker at
Mon Jan 31 12:13:19 PST 2000

Archie Cobbs <archie at> writes:

> and use INTEGER_PRIMITIVE_CLASS instead of "int".. would this work?

No, its even worse, since a class in the anonymous package is alot
more likely to be called "I" than "int".  We can use "I" only where a
class would be L<path>;.  


More information about the kaffe mailing list