[kaffe] Re: "Hall of Shame" suggestion
sballard at netreach.com
Thu Apr 1 06:13:02 PST 2004
> It must not be made in a rude manner though. No ranting. Maybe there
> were reasons of using private stuff, maybe contacting the developers of
> that specific software is also a good idea.
Yes, when I said "actively refuse" I meant that the developers have been
contacted privately and still insist on keeping the dependency, despite
knowing told that this will make their software break on Free VMs.
Even if my proposal is adopted it would be very bad to just start
putting programs up there without giving their maintainers a chance to
redeem their software.
We could even be very generous and allow the project maintainers to
submit a short quote to be used in their defense, that would show up
along with the Hall of Shame entry.
Stuart Ballard, Senior Web Developer
(215) 283-2300, ext. 126
More information about the kaffe